Case 4110922/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4110922/2014 Ms L McCabe v Tradeteam — 2024
- Case reference
- 4110922/2014
- Decision date
- 5 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4110922/2014 Ms L McCabe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant had been given an opportunity on 8 October 2024 to provide written reasons by 22 October 2024, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The tribunal found that the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, and it therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim type inferred from the official listing categories; the judgment text itself refers only to 'the claim' and does not restate the pleaded causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim type inferred from the official listing categories; the judgment text itself refers only to 'the claim' and does not restate the pleaded causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
- Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.