Case 4110950/2018 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4110950/2018 Mrs S Moorhead v Represented by: Ms H J Durham - Solicitor Wood Group UK Limited st and 1 other — 2018

Case reference: 4110950/2018
Decision date: 15 November 2018
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Nicol Hosie

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4110950/2018 Mrs S Moorhead

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment records that the claim in case S/4110950/2018 was withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.

No substantive liability findings, remedy assessment, or factual findings are set out in the extracted text. The document also does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action in the judgment text itself, so the claim type cannot be stated with confidence from the judgment alone.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment states only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. It does not specify the underlying claim type or any substantive findings.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.