Case 4110991/2012 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Dyball v Unrepresented: West Dunbartonshire Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4110991/2012
- Decision date
- 5 June 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Dyball
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, presided over by Employment Judge Frances Eccles sitting in Glasgow, struck out the claimant's case. The judgment states that the claim was struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
The reasons recorded that on 18 May 2017 the Tribunal gave the claimant until 25 May 2017 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing for that issue. The claimant did neither within the permitted time.
The Tribunal found that the claimant had failed to give an acceptable reason why a judgment striking out the claim should not be made, and had also failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment does not describe the underlying substantive claim type, but the gov.uk listing for this case is categorised as Equal Pay Act. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.