Case 4110992/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Case Number: 4110992/2014 Mr H Currie v West Dunbartonshire Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 4110992/2014
- Decision date
- 8 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Case Number: 4110992/2014 Mr H Currie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Lucy Wiseman struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, in terms of rule 38(1)(d).
The Tribunal recorded that on 13 May 2025 it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 27 May 2025, or to request a hearing, to address why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not set out the underlying factual allegations; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category supplied with the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not set out the underlying factual allegations; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category supplied with the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.