Case 4111035/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111035/2015 Mr G Calder v Represented by: Dr A Gibson WSP UK Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 4111035/2015
- Decision date
- 23 May 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo A.
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111035/2015 Mr G Calder
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records only that the claim, insofar as it related to remedy, had been withdrawn by the claimant. The Employment Tribunal then dismissed that part of the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on liability, unfair dismissal, whistleblowing, breach of contract, or any remedy award are set out in the extracted text. The judgment therefore records a procedural disposal only, with no monetary award or split of compensation.
The decision was issued by Employment Judge Murdo A. MacLeod on 17 May 2017 and entered in the register and copied to the parties on 23 May 2017.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim in so far as it related to remedy had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.