Case 4111110/2012 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111110/2012 Ms A McFall v Represented by: Thompsons Solicitors West Dunbartonshire Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4111110/2012
- Decision date
- 9 June 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111110/2012 Ms A McFall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms A McFall was represented by Thompsons Solicitors and West Dunbartonshire Council was represented by Mr G Walsh, solicitor.
The tribunal stated that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No findings on the merits or remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The underlying claim type is inferred from the gov.uk Equal Pay Act listing because the judgment text does not otherwise specify the substance of the claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.