Case 4111111/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Costello v Glasgow City Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 4111111/2019
- Decision date
- 10 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Strain
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Costello
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing, the Tribunal considered whether the claimant's Equality Act 2010 claims should be struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal orders. The relevant orders dated 14 July 2020, 8 August 2020 and 8 January 2021 required the claimant to provide specification of his disability discrimination claims, including the what, when, where, who and why of the allegations.
The Tribunal found that the claimant had not complied with those orders despite guidance from the Tribunal and warnings that non-compliance could lead to strike out under Rule 37(c). The claimant maintained that he had already provided the required information, including through emails, but the Tribunal found that he had not provided the specification ordered.
Applying the two-stage strike out approach, the Tribunal was satisfied that non-compliance with Tribunal orders was established and then considered whether to exercise its discretion. Taking account of the overriding objective, the claimant's status as a party litigant, the time allowed, and the repeated guidance and warnings given, the Tribunal concluded that this was a clear case for strike out of the Equality Act claims. The Tribunal did not determine whether the discrimination claims had merit because they had not been sufficiently specified.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment struck out the claimant's Equality Act 2010 claims for non-compliance with Tribunal orders requiring specification of his disability discrimination claims. The judgment does not determine the merits of those claims. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- overriding objective
- Rule 37(c)
- HM Prison Service v Dolby two-stage test
- Hassan v Tesco Stores two-stage test
- Anyanwu v South Bank Students' Union
- Tayside Public Transport Co Ltd v Reilly
- Ukegheson v Haringey London Borough Council
- Ahir v British Airways plc
- Mechkarov v Citi Bank NA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.