Case 4111126/2012 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111126/2012 Ms K Splaine v Represented by: Thompsons West Dunbartonshire Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4111126/2012
- Decision date
- 27 June 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111126/2012 Ms K Splaine
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms K Splaine was represented by Thompsons and West Dunbartonshire Council was represented by Mr G Walsh, solicitor.
The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the claim. It records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment states that the claim, having been withdrawn by the claimant, was dismissed under Rule 52. The gov.uk listing category identifies the claim as Equal Pay Act, but the judgment text itself does not set out substantive allegations. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.