Case 4111126/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge J M Hendry Case No: 4111126/2019 Miss C Wallace v Represented by: In Person Di Maggios Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4111126/2019
- Decision date
- 9 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Hendry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge J M Hendry Case No: 4111126/2019 Miss C Wallace
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short procedural disposal. It records that Miss C Wallace’s claim against Di Maggios Group Ltd was withdrawn by the claimant and, as a result, dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings of fact, liability reasoning, or remedy assessment are set out in the text. The judgment does not specify the individual heads of claim, although the case listing identifies religion or belief discrimination and unfair dismissal as the categories on the GOV.UK entry.
The only recorded judicial action is dismissal following withdrawal. The judgment is dated 6 December 2019 and was sent to the parties on 9 December 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not set out the substantive claims; it records only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.