Case 4111158/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Matthew Law v Phoenix Security (UK) Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4111158/2018
- Decision date
- 3 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mary Kearns
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Matthew Law
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Matthew Law worked for Phoenix Security (UK) Limited as a security guard from 17 January to 16 June 2018. The tribunal accepted his evidence and the supporting text messages showing that he had been offered the head doorman role at McDonalds Argyle Street at £12.50 per hour. It found that, for the first two weeks while he worked alongside another doorman, he was correctly paid the steward rate of £9.50 per hour.
The tribunal found that from the 16 February 2018 payslip onward he should have been paid £12.50 per hour as head doorman, but was instead paid lower rates on a number of occasions. It preferred the claimant's evidence and pay records over the respondent's written submission, which it said did not fully take account of the payslips produced. The table in the reasons set out the shortfalls by pay period and showed a total deficit of £395.07 after allowing for two pay credit adjustments of £66.
The tribunal held that this amounted to unlawful deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also referred to section 23 as the route for bringing the complaint. Because the claimant had left employment, the tribunal ordered the sum to be paid gross of tax and National Insurance, leaving him to account to HMRC if required.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to £12.50 per hour once he became head doorman, that he was paid lower rates on later payslips, and that after allowing for two £66 credit adjustments the total shortfall was £395.07. | Upheld | — | £395 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £395
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £395
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.