Case 4111189/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4111189/2018 Ms P Beck v Cordia Services LLP Glasgow City Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 4111189/2018
- Decision date
- 27 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4111189/2018 Ms P Beck
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn, and the claimant did not reply to a status enquiry asking her to confirm her intentions regarding the claim. A strike out warning letter sent on 26 February 2025 was returned because the claimant no longer lived at the address on the ET1, and she had not provided a new address. The tribunal stated that, because it could not communicate with her, it assumed she no longer wished to pursue the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The listing category indicates Equal Pay Act and the judgment refers only to 'the claim'; the tribunal struck out the claim for not being actively pursued under rule 38(1)(d), without adjudicating the substantive equal pay issues. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024
- rule 38(2) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.