Case 4111277/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111277/2021 Ms M Lawrence v Represented by: Ms A Bowman - Solicitor Carlisle Support Services Group Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4111277/2021
- Decision date
- 23 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jane Porter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111277/2021 Ms M Lawrence
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a single-issue case brought by Ms M Lawrence against Carlisle Support Services Group Limited. The judgment records that the claim under Equality of Terms (EQP) only had been withdrawn by the claimant.
The Employment Tribunal therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive findings on liability or remedy are recorded in the judgment text provided.
The judgment is dated 22 November 2021 and was entered in the register on 23 November 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The only claim was an Equality of Terms (EQP) claim. The judgment records that it had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunal Rules. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.