Case 4111299/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111299/2019 Mr G Russell v MDE (Scotland) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4111299/2019
- Decision date
- 12 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111299/2019 Mr G Russell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented by the respondent. Employment Judge Frances Eccles determined the claim without a hearing and cancelled the listed hearing on 13 December 2019.
The tribunal found that MDE (Scotland) Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr G Russell's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £494 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £1,144 for that claim. The judgment records no separate award structure beyond those two sums, so the total award is £1,638.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £494 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,144 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,638
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.