Case 4111316/2019 · Employment Tribunal

69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4111316/2019 Mr M Lumsden v SSE Electricity Limited — 2019

Case reference: 4111316/2019
Decision date: 27 December 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Ian McFatridge

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4111316/2019 Mr M Lumsden

Respondent

SSE Electricity Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Ian McFatridge issued this one-page judgment on 27 December 2019 in Mr M Lumsden's case against SSE Electricity Limited. The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.

The extracted text records no substantive findings on liability and no monetary award. It also does not identify the underlying claim type(s) in the judgment text provided, so no merits-based outcome can be extracted beyond the dismissal upon withdrawal.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. The extracted text does not identify the underlying complaint(s), so it is classified as 'other'.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.