Case 4111322/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4111322/2021 Mr RM Clark v Gargunnock Village Store — 2022
- Case reference
- 4111322/2021
- Decision date
- 11 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4111322/2021 Mr RM Clark
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages, had dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice, and had failed to pay holiday entitlement.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. The awards recorded were £4,410.45 for unlawful deduction from wages, £1,470.15 for breach of contract notice pay, £2,238.17 for redundancy payment, and £693.58 for holiday pay.
The unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not record any separate basic award, compensatory award, interest, or discrimination finding.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £4,410.45, calculated as 33 weeks' pay at £133.65. | Upheld | — | £4,410 |
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,470.15, stated as 11 weeks' pay at £133.65. | Upheld | — | £1,470 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,238.17, calculated as 11 years x 1.5 weeks' pay at £203.47. | Upheld | — | £2,238 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £693.58, stated as 35.5 hours at £8.72 plus 43.1 hours at £8.91. | Upheld | — | £694 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,812
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.