Case 4111358/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v IG Vehicles Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4111358/2021
- Decision date
- 2 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and an Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,876.84, calculated as 12 weeks' pay at £323.07 per week.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £9,692.00, calculated at 1.5 weeks' pay for each of the claimant's 20 years of service. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £969.21, calculated as 3 weeks' pay at £323.07 per week. The hearing listed for 25 November 2021 was cancelled, and the total award was £14,538.05.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded at 12 weeks' pay of £323.07 per week. | Upheld | — | £3,877 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment calculated at 1.5 weeks' pay for each of 20 years' service. | Upheld | — | £9,692 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of 3 weeks' pay at £323.07 per week. | Upheld | — | £969 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,538
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.