Case 4111364/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111364/2021 Miss E Quinn v Pitter Patter Childcare Ltd and 2 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 4111364/2021
- Decision date
- 1 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
4 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111364/2021 Miss E Quinn
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued a rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,596.70 for the period 24/6/21 to 2/8/21.
The claimant's breach of contract claim in respect of notice pay also succeeded. The tribunal ordered damages of £1,806.40, described as 4 weeks' notice pay.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the balance of the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £451.60, stated to relate to 4 days. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £4,854.70.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £2,596.70 for the period 24/6/21 to 2/8/21. | Upheld | — | £2,597 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's notice pay claim succeeded; the tribunal ordered damages of £1,806.40, stated to be 4 weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,806 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the balance of the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £451.60 for 4 days. | Upheld | — | £452 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,855
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.