Case 4111368/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Tinnion Mr. Paolo De Marchi v Hideout Scot Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4111368/2021
- Decision date
- 30 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr. A.
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Tinnion Mr. Paolo De Marchi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages under ss.13(1) and 23(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It awarded £927.80, made up of £463.90 for unpaid wages in April 2021 and £463.90 for unpaid wages in July 2021.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's complaint of unpaid holiday pay under regs 14(2) and 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It awarded £418.39 for 48.04 hours at £8.72 per hour. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment was £1,346.19. The decision was given orally, and the note states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard practice.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Well founded under ss.13(1) and 23(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996. Award included £463.90 unpaid wages for April 2021 and £463.90 unpaid wages for July 2021. | Upheld | — | £928 |
| Holiday pay | Well founded under regs 14(2) and 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. Award was for 48.04 hours at £8.72 per hour. | Upheld | — | £418 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,346
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- ss.13(1) and 23(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- regs 14(2) and 30(1)(b) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.