Case 4111379/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number:4111379/2021 Mr S Klyn v Represented by: Ms S Garvie-McInally, solicitor Agriculture Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4111379/2021
- Decision date
- 25 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mel Sangster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number:4111379/2021 Mr S Klyn
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Klyn brought a complaint of disability discrimination against 2 Agriculture Limited. The judgment records only that the complaint was withdrawn by the claimant.
Because the complaint had been withdrawn, Employment Judge Mel Sangster dismissed it under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No liability findings on the substance of the discrimination allegation are recorded in the extracted text.
The judgment is a short disposal decision and does not record any remedy, hearing evidence, or further legal analysis beyond the dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of disability discrimination was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.