Case 4111384/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111384/2019 Ms L Mitchell v Mr David Walker, Sophies Sparkle Cleaning Services — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111384/2019
- Decision date
- 7 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Muriel Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111384/2019 Ms L Mitchell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Muriel Robison issued a rule 21 judgment on the available material on 7 January 2020. The tribunal found that the respondent, Mr David Walker, Sophies Sparkle Cleaning Services, had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms L Mitchell's wages and ordered payment of £412.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £119. The judgment records no separate award for interest or any other remedy, so the bottom-line sum payable appears to be £531.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment on the available material; no response was presented to the claim. | Upheld | — | £412 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment on the available material; no response was presented to the claim. | Upheld | — | £119 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £531
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.