Case 4111389/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4111389/2019 Mr C Scoular v Glasgow City Council City Building (Glasgow) LLP — 2023
- Case reference
- 4111389/2019
- Decision date
- 16 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4111389/2019 Mr C Scoular
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 16 August 2023 Employment Judge Frances Eccles struck out the claimant's case under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment states that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 12 July 2023 to provide written reasons by 2 August 2023, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did neither.
The tribunal therefore found that no acceptable reason had been given to avoid strike out and dismissed the claim on that procedural basis. No substantive findings on the underlying merits or any remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s); it records that 'the claim' was struck out for lack of active pursuit under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.