Case 4111420/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Muir v Not present or represented Nicola Thomson — 2019
- Case reference
- 4111420/2019
- Decision date
- 13 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Muir
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs L Muir brought a claim for a redundancy payment following the termination of her employment with Nicola Thomson. The tribunal recorded that the claimant said her employment started on 26 March 2015 and ended on 27 April 2019. No ET3 response was lodged, and neither party appeared at the preliminary hearing on 6 December 2019.
The tribunal proceeded in the parties' absence under Rule 47 after the clerk telephoned the claimant and the call went to voicemail. On limitation, the judge noted that although the ET1 had been submitted outwith the three-month period that applies to claims such as wages and unfair dismissal, the statutory time limit for a redundancy payment is six months from the relevant date. The relevant date was 27 April 2019, and the claim was within six months in any event, with the early conciliation period extending time by 16 days.
The tribunal held that it had jurisdiction under sections 163 and 164 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. It calculated the award as six weeks' pay at £261 per week, producing a total of £1,566.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Tribunal held the claim was in time under s.164 ERA 1996. It found the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of six weeks' pay at a weekly rate of £261, totalling £1,566. | Upheld | — | £1,566 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,566
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 47
- s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.164 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.