Case 4111450/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Wilson v Border Cars Group Ltd (in Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111450/2019
- Decision date
- 6 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Wilson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge R Gall struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The reasons record a lack of contact from the claimant despite requests from the Tribunal to be informed of the position.
On 5 June 2020 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 26 June 2020, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing.
The judgment therefore records no substantive determination of the underlying dispute and no monetary award. The only recorded outcome is that the claim was struck out for non-pursuit under rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify any substantive claim type in the strike-out decision; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.