Case 4111494/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Elecore Electrical Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4111494/2021
- Decision date
- 12 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued judgment on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. It recorded that the respondent did not contest the claim and that the respondent was in compulsory liquidation, but the relevant court had granted permission for these proceedings to continue on 22 April 2022.
The tribunal found that the complaint of failure to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded. It found that the respondent had dismissed as redundant more than 20 employees at one establishment within a period of 90 days or less, and that it had failed to ensure that employee representatives were elected in accordance with section 188A and then consult with them in accordance with section 188.
The tribunal made a protective award in respect of all employees dismissed by reason of redundancy at Elecore Electrical Ltd, Unit 2, Building 3, Irvine Road, Largs, KA30 8EZ. It ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period, which began on 15 July 2021 and lasted for 90 days. The judgment does not state a monetary figure for the award in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Complaint under section 188 TULRCA 1992 held well founded; the tribunal made a protective award for all employees dismissed by reason of redundancy, with a protected period of 90 days beginning on 15 July 2021. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 188A TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.