Case 4111536/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111536/2019 Ms M Kozak v Eurodon Cuisine Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4111536/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Muriel Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111536/2019 Ms M Kozak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge Muriel Robison found that Ms M Kozak had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The respondent was ordered to pay damages of £328.00 for that breach.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £328.00 in relation to that claim. The judgment does not set out any additional findings, legal tests, or split of the awards beyond those two sums.
The listed hearing on 8 January 2020 was cancelled. The judgment was dated 14 November 2019 and entered in the register on 19 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal determined under rule 21, on the available material and without a response from the respondent, that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £328.00. | Upheld | — | £328 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal determined under rule 21, on the available material and without a response from the respondent, that the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £328.00. | Upheld | — | £328 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £656
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.