Case 4111557/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Greenwood v Independent Living Support — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111557/2019
- Decision date
- 5 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Greenwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 30 July 2020, Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman determined whether Mrs M Greenwood was a disabled person within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time. The hearing was limited to that issue and to whether the respondent knew, or could reasonably have been expected to know, of any disability; the respondent said it would concede constructive knowledge if disability were established.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had anxiety and depression, which had been ongoing since at least 2010, and that the condition caused substantial adverse effects on normal day-to-day activities including sleep, concentration, coping and daily functioning. It rejected the respondent's submission that a June 2019 fit note for "stress" meant the claimant no longer had anxiety and depression, and it did not accept that the medical note recording "no suicidality" undermined her credibility.
The tribunal found the impairment was long term, that a calmer period and an attempt to reduce medication did not end the substantial adverse effect, and that any treatment should be disregarded when assessing disability. It also found that, without medication, the effects would be substantial. On that basis, the tribunal held that Mrs Greenwood was disabled at the relevant time; no separate substantive discrimination or wrongful dismissal findings were made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal found the claimant was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time. The respondent said it would concede constructive knowledge if disability was established; the substantive complaints listed earlier in the reasons were not decided in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- substantial adverse effect
- long-term adverse effect
- effect likely to recur
- measures taken to treat or correct impairment disregarded
- McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College 2007 ICR 1567
- SCA Packaging v Boyle 2009 ICR 1056
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.