Case 4111578/2019 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case no. 4111578/2019 Held at Edinburgh on January 2020 Employment Judge: W A Meiklejohn Mr Victor Jones v No appearance or representation Hallford Douglas — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111578/2019
- Decision date
- 10 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case no. 4111578/2019 Held at Edinburgh on January 2020 Employment Judge: W A Meiklejohn Mr Victor Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Victor Jones brought a claim for unlawful deduction of wages against Hallford Douglas, stating in his ET1 that he had carried out unpaid work for 9 hours over 3 days and entering £0 as his pay. The respondent did not present a response to the claim. The tribunal listed the case for a final hearing on 8 January 2020 at Edinburgh.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was dismissed because the claimant did not provide sufficient information for the tribunal to determine the sum claimed. The tribunal had sought clarification of the claimant's rate of pay, but he did not respond and did not attend the final hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13(1) ERA 1996
- section 23(1)(a) ERA 1996
- section 24(1) ERA 1996
- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.