Case 4111590/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111590/2019 Mr C Joseph v Cipher Games Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4111590/2019
- Decision date
- 6 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111590/2019 Mr C Joseph
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. On the material available, Employment Judge M Kearns determined the claim without a hearing and cancelled the listed hearing on 10 January 2020.
The tribunal found that Cipher Games Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr C Joseph's wages and ordered it to pay £480.38. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £132. The judgment does not record any further reasoning, split of remedy beyond those two sums, or any award for interest.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested, and the tribunal ordered payment of £480.38 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £480 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: the tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £132. | Upheld | — | £132 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £612
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.