Case 4111604/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Case Number: 4111604/2018 Ms C McCaffrey v Cordia Services LLP Glasgow City Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 4111604/2018
- Decision date
- 28 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Case Number: 4111604/2018 Ms C McCaffrey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024, on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued in terms of rule 38(1)(d).
The reasons record that the claimant's solicitors had withdrawn, that a strike out warning letter was sent following the claimant's failure to respond to a status enquiry about whether she intended to continue the claim, and that correspondence was returned because the claimant no longer lived at the address provided on the ET1. The Tribunal stated that no steps had been taken to provide a new address, leaving it unable to communicate with the claimant or give notice under rule 38(2). It therefore assumed that she no longer wished to pursue the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment records that the claim was struck out under rule 38 because it had not been actively pursued. The underlying equal pay claim was not adjudicated on its merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024
- rule 38(2) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.