Case 4111613/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4111613/2021 Hearing Held by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on January 2022 Employment Judge - A Strain Mr C Tonner v Teleperformance limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4111613/2021
- Decision date
- 14 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alan Strain
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4111613/2021 Hearing Held by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on January 2022 Employment Judge - A Strain Mr C Tonner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the hearing was held by Cloud Video Platform on 10 January 2022 before Employment Judge Alan Strain. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a senior HR professional.
The judgment states that the claimant's claim was unsuccessful and was dismissed. The written reasons do not set out the pleaded claim, factual findings, or legal reasoning; they record that oral reasons were provided to the parties at the conclusion of the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The gov.uk listing categories suggest breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages and working time claims, but the judgment text itself only states that the claimant's claim was unsuccessful and dismissed without identifying the specific claim adjudicated. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.