Case 4111616/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Lorusso v Hope Street Lease Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111616/2019
- Decision date
- 6 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Lorusso
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 6 January 2020, before Employment Judge R Gall, no evidence was taken. The tribunal explored the claimant's length of service and the claimant accepted there had been a break in service between 15 April 2018 and 6 August 2018. He also accepted that he did not have the continuous service needed to pursue a constructive unfair dismissal claim, so he did not insist upon that claim.
The remaining issue was the claim for unlawful deductions from wages. The claimant said deductions had been made for income tax and national insurance but had not been accounted for to HMRC, which affected his tax record. Mr Douglas, appearing for the respondent notwithstanding the absence of an ET3, said the current respondent had only employed the claimant from April 2019 and had accounted properly for tax and national insurance, and that the earlier employer may have been MAP Solutions Ltd. The tribunal indicated that the claim may have been brought against the wrong party and that an application to add MAP as a respondent might be made.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of the wage claim at that hearing. It adjourned the case, sisted it until a case management preliminary hearing on 6 February 2020, and noted that there may be a jurisdiction issue because the sums may have been properly deducted from wages but retained by the employer rather than unpaid to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant said he had a gap in service between 15 April 2018 and 6 August 2018 and accepted that he did not have continuity of service. He therefore did not insist upon his constructive unfair dismissal claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | No substantive determination was made. The claimant said the employer had retained deductions for income tax and national insurance without accounting for them to HMRC; the tribunal raised a possible jurisdiction issue and considered that the claim may have been brought against the wrong respondent. The hearing was adjourned for case management. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- 2 years continuous service requirement
- Rule 21(3) Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.