Case 4111631/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss SJ Robertson v Parklands Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111631/2019
- Decision date
- 7 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hosie
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss SJ Robertson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss SJ Robertson's claim against Parklands Ltd under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The stated grounds were non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 29 July 2020 requiring a Schedule of Loss under Rule 37(1)(c), and that the claim had not been actively pursued under Rule 37(1)(d).
On 25 September 2020 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 5 October 2020, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The tribunal recorded that she failed to give an acceptable reason or to request a hearing.
In light of that failure, Employment Judge Hosie made the strike-out order on 7 October 2020. No substantive determination of the merits and no monetary remedy were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 37 for non-compliance with an order dated 29 July 2020 to provide a Schedule of Loss and because the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37(1)(c)
- Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.