Case 4111652/2012 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Bruce v Unrepresented: West Dunbartonshire Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4111652/2012
- Decision date
- 5 June 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Bruce
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that on 18 May 2017 it gave Mr C Bruce an opportunity to provide written reasons by 25 May 2017, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment identifies the respondent as West Dunbartonshire Council and was issued by Employment Judge Frances Eccles on 5 June 2017.
Mr Bruce did not give an acceptable reason why a strike-out should not be made and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The extracted judgment does not restate the underlying substantive claim type; classified as equal_pay from the case listing/context. The claim was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.