Case 4111661/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4111661/2021 Mr S Johnson v Teleperformance limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4111661/2021
- Decision date
- 16 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4111661/2021 Mr S Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims alleging unlawful deductions from wages and failure to pay the minimum wage. He said in the claim form that he had evidence to prove what he was owed and identified sums said to be due under headings including standard hours, holiday hours and 15 minutes before the start of shifts.
A case management Preliminary Hearing took place by telephone on 14 January 2022, which the claimant did not attend. The Tribunal ordered him to provide a written statement with supporting documentation setting out the remedy sought and how much he sought for each complaint, including the calculation.
The claimant did not provide the required information or documentation, despite a reminder and an opportunity to give written reasons or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The Tribunal struck out the claim on the basis of failure to comply with the order.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim as presented included allegations of unlawful deductions from wages. The claim was struck out for non-compliance with a Tribunal order under rule 37(1)(c). | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The claim as presented also alleged failure to pay the minimum wage. There is no locked claim_type enum specifically for National Minimum Wage, so this is classified as other. The claim was struck out for non-compliance with a Tribunal order under rule 37(1)(c). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(c)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.