Case 4111664/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111664/2021 Mr R Moore v Kalamazoo IT Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4111664/2021
- Decision date
- 12 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O'Donnell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111664/2021 Mr R Moore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the material available, Employment Judge P O'Donnell made findings in favour of the claimant, Mr R Moore, against Kalamazoo IT Limited on 12 January 2022.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £8,161.14 for that claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed. It awarded a basic award of £14,199.56 and a compensatory award of £2,863.48 in respect of the unfair dismissal claim.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,494. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £26,718.18.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £8,161.14. | Upheld | — | £8,161 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £14,199.56 plus a compensatory award of £2,863.48. | Upheld | — | £17,063 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,494. | Upheld | — | £1,494 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,718
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £14,200
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,863
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.