Case 4111669/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111669/2019 Mr M Ismail v Represented by: Joanne May Solicitor University Of St Andrews — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111669/2019
- Decision date
- 23 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alexander Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111669/2019 Mr M Ismail
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr M Ismail's claim against the University of St Andrews was withdrawn by the claimant. Employment Judge Alexander Kemp accordingly dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted text does not contain any findings on the substantive merits of the claim, nor any remedy award. The only operative outcome recorded is dismissal following withdrawal, with the judgment dated 23 March 2020 and sent to the parties on the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The extracted text does not identify any merits determination. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.