Case 4111700/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Greig Paterson v Represented by Ms A Bowman,15 Solicitor SSE Contracting Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111700/2019
- Decision date
- 23 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Hendry
- Venue
- Inverness
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Greig Paterson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Paterson worked for SSE Contracting Limited from 27 July 2009 until 14 June 2019 as an electrician. His statement of employment particulars described the contract as an abridged version of the Direct Staff (Non-Lighting Services) JNC agreement, and it dealt with travelling and other expenses, but it did not expressly refer to the SJIB for travel. The respondent's evidence was that Scottish employees had been paid according to SJIB rates for wages and travel since around 2007 for business reasons.
The tribunal found that the documentary position had not been set out with complete clarity, but it accepted that the practice in Scotland was to pay travel in line with the SJIB arrangement. It noted the weekly timesheets and travel forms, which referred to SJIB and to the relevant mileage bands, and the January 2017 presentation to staff explaining the change to the mileage-based travel regime. Although the claimant said he did not understand the position until late 2018, the tribunal found that he was aware of the controversy for some years and placed little weight on the delay in raising his own grievance.
Applying the contractual and implied-term arguments advanced by the parties, the tribunal held that the claimant should have been aware before the 2017 changes that SJIB regulated travel expenses, and in any event the presentation made the position clear. It found that staff, including the claimant, had accepted the SJIB arrangement through their conduct and by continuing to work and submit weekly travel claims without protest. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the breach of contract claim.
The parties had agreed that, if the claimant had succeeded, the quantum would have been £13,608.70. No award was made because the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim concerned whether travel expenses should have been paid under the JNC agreement rather than the SJIB arrangement. The tribunal held the claim failed because, despite an error in the written documentation, the respondent had paid travel under SJIB in practice and the claimant had accepted that arrangement. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- implied term by conduct
- custom and practice
- officious bystander test
- reasonable understanding
- Duke v Reliant Systems
- CSC Computer Sciences v McAlinden
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.