Case 4111720/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111720/2019 Mr R Cairns v Dalgarven House Hotel Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4111720/2019
- Decision date
- 12 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111720/2019 Mr R Cairns
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because no response was presented. On the available material, Employment Judge Frances Eccles found that Dalgarven House Hotel Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr R Cairns's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £595 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £1,224 for that failure. The hearing listed for 15 January 2020 was cancelled. No further remedy breakdown, interest award, or other findings were recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: no response was presented. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £595. | Upheld | — | £595 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: no response was presented. The tribunal held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,224. | Upheld | — | £1,224 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,819
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.