Case 4111746/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Butler v Mairi Claire Dwyer — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111746/2019
- Decision date
- 6 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Butler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs M Butler was employed as a waitress at Nellie Browns from 17 March 2014, working 18 hours a week for £147 per week. When Ms Tighe sold the business, the respondent took over the same coffee shop from the same premises, under the same name, with the same staff and equipment, and the tribunal found there was no gap in the claimant's employment between 29 September 2018 and 1 October 2018.
The principal issue on the redundancy and notice claims was whether the October 2018 change of ownership broke continuity. The tribunal held that s.218(2) ERA 1996 applied, and that the purchase was also a relevant transfer under TUPE 2006. On that basis, the claimant's service with Ms Tighe counted towards her continuous employment with the respondent and her employment transferred on the same terms and conditions. The tribunal therefore found that she had 5 years' continuous service at dismissal.
The tribunal accepted that the respondent ceased trading in June 2019, so the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy within s.139(1)(a)(i) ERA 1996. It also found that she was dismissed on 17 June 2019 with no prior notice, so she was dismissed in breach of contract and was entitled to 5 weeks' notice under s.86 ERA 1996. Using her age of 63 and 5 years' service, the tribunal calculated statutory redundancy pay at 7.5 weeks' pay and awarded £1,102.00.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the contractual holiday year set out in the 2014 statement of terms transferred with the claimant under TUPE. It held that by the date of dismissal she had worked 108 days in the leave year beginning 1 March 2019 and had taken 5 days' holiday. Applying regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, the tribunal calculated 2 days' untaken holiday at £36.75 per day and awarded £73.50. The tribunal's overall monetary awards were £1,102.00, £735.00 and £73.50, totalling £1,910.50.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant had 5 years' continuous service because the business transfer in October 2018 did not break continuity under s.218(2) ERA 1996 and TUPE 2006. It held she was dismissed by reason of redundancy when the respondent ceased trading. | Upheld | — | £1,102 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed on 17 June 2019 without prior notice and was entitled to 5 weeks' notice under s.86 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £735 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant's holiday year continued on the contractual terms issued by the previous owner and, applying regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, awarded pay in lieu of untaken holiday on termination. | Upheld | — | £74 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,911
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.135 ERA 1996
- s.139(1)(a)(i) ERA 1996
- s.162 ERA 1996
- s.86 ERA 1996
- s.211 ERA 1996
- s.212 ERA 1996
- s.218(2) ERA 1996
- Regulation 3 TUPE 2006
- Regulation 4 TUPE 2006
- Regulations 13 and 13A Working Time Regulations
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.