Case 4111755/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111755/2021 Miss A Reid v Forth Care Limited (in Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4111755/2021
- Decision date
- 15 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111755/2021 Miss A Reid
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim form was sent to the respondent on 25 October 2021, but the respondent did not enter a response. The reasons record that on 16 May 2022 the respondent entered creditors’ voluntary liquidation, that the liquidators said they had no intention of entering the proceedings, and that there were no funds in the liquidation to meet the claim. The Employment Judge decided that, on the material available, liability could properly be determined without a hearing under Rule 21, but that remedy could not be determined on the papers.
The judgment states that the claimant’s complaints of unfair dismissal, protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, redundancy pay, holiday pay, arrears of pay, and notice pay succeeded against the first respondent. The second respondent was removed from the proceedings. The judgment did not assess remedy and said that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled would be determined at a hearing if required.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Succeeded against the first respondent under the Rule 21 default judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; succeeded against the first respondent. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Succeeded against the first respondent. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Succeeded against the first respondent. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of pay succeeded against the first respondent. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay succeeded against the first respondent. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.