Case 4111763/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4111763/2019 Mrs A Harvie v Thomas Cook — 2021
- Case reference
- 4111763/2019
- Decision date
- 18 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4111763/2019 Mrs A Harvie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was submitted on 18 October 2019. The Tribunal informed the claimant on 30 October 2019 that the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and that permission to proceed had to be sought from the court dealing with the liquidation proceedings.
The Tribunal later sought updates from the parties about whether consent had been sought. The respondent stated that it was unaware of any application by the claimant to the High Court. On 28 June 2021 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 12 July 2021, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why strike-out judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal struck out the claim on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and strikes it out for not being actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). It does not identify the underlying claim type in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.