Case 4111780/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4111780/2021 Mrs Rosicova v Represented by: Mr P Kissen – Solicitor The People's Energy Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4111780/2021
- Decision date
- 27 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4111780/2021 Mrs Rosicova
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 30 July 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 13 August 2024, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The tribunal recorded that the claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The judgment states that the claim was struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The decision therefore disposed of the claim without any substantive determination of the underlying complaint.
No financial award was made. The judgment is a strike-out decision only, signed electronically by Employment Judge M A Macleod and entered on 27 August 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.