Case 4111814/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Clements v Glasgow City Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111814/2019
- Decision date
- 3 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Clements
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The reasons record that, after a preliminary hearing on 20 February 2020, the claimant was given until 2 April 2020 to say whether she wished to pursue the claim, but no reply was received. On 11 May 2020 the Tribunal gave the claimant until 8 June 2020 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing, so the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The gov.uk listing category identifies the case as sex discrimination. The judgment itself records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued; it does not adjudicate the substantive allegations. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.