Case 4111842/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Smith v Teleperformance limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111842/2019
- Decision date
- 21 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant had withdrawn complaints of alleged unlawful discrimination on grounds of disability, sex, and philosophical belief, and a complaint of failure to pay holiday pay. Those parts of the claim were dismissed on the respondents' unopposed application following the withdrawals.
The Tribunal also recorded that the remaining complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract for alleged failure to pay notice pay had not been withdrawn. Those complaints were to proceed to a Final Hearing before a full Tribunal for full disposal, including remedy if appropriate.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claimant withdrew this complaint under Rule 51 on 14 February 2020; it was dismissed on the respondents' unopposed application under Rule 52. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The claimant withdrew this complaint under Rule 51 on 14 February 2020; it was dismissed on the respondents' unopposed application under Rule 52. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment refers to alleged discrimination on grounds of philosophical belief. The claimant withdrew this complaint under Rule 51 on 14 February 2020; it was dismissed on the respondents' unopposed application under Rule 52. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant withdrew the complaint of failure to pay holiday pay under Rule 51 on 14 February 2020; it was dismissed on the respondents' unopposed application under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | This complaint was not withdrawn and was to proceed to a Final Hearing for full disposal, including remedy if appropriate. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | This complaint concerned alleged failure to pay notice pay. It was not withdrawn and was to proceed to a Final Hearing for full disposal, including remedy if appropriate. |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 51
- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.