Case 4111862/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111862/2019 Smart Leasing Solutions Limited v Represented by: Ms A Beattie, Solicitor Mr N Smith — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111862/2019
- Decision date
- 17 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alexander Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4111862/2019 Smart Leasing Solutions Limited
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only recorded disposal in the judgment is a counter-claim. Employment Judge Alexander Kemp noted that the counter-claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and accordingly dismissed it under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment is dated 17 March 2020 and was sent to the parties on the same date.
No substantive findings on liability, evidence, or remedy are set out in the extracted text, and no monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the counter-claim was withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.