Case 4111910/2018 · Employment Tribunal
A Kemp (sitting alone) Mrs J Henry v Represented by Ms J Redpath Solicitor Highland Health Board — 2019
- Case reference
- 4111910/2018
- Decision date
- 8 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
- Venue
- Inverness
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Kemp (sitting alone) Mrs J Henry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 8 February 2019, the claimant applied to amend the claim to add a section 47E Employment Rights Act 1996 claim. The tribunal refused that amendment. It held that there was no sufficient explanation for the delay in making the application, which was already out of time, and it considered that the proposed new claim had no reasonable prospects of success because the pleadings did not set out the requirements needed to found a section 47E claim, including the written application requirements in section 80F.
The claimant's separate stigma damages claim was withdrawn by her solicitor at the hearing. The tribunal therefore dismissed it under Rule 52 and treated it as struck out accordingly. The tribunal allowed the amendment only so far as it clarified the existing constructive dismissal and breach of contract claims, including the allegation that the final straw was the respondent's letter withdrawing the right of appeal.
On the breach of contract issue, the tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to consider the claim because it arose on termination and fell within section 3 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 and the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) Order 1994. It refused the respondent's strike-out application under Rule 37. The tribunal said duplication with the constructive dismissal claim might arise, but it was not yet clear that the breach of contract claim had no reasonable prospects of success, and no final merits determination was made at this stage.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claimant withdrew the separate stigma damages claim at the preliminary hearing, and the tribunal dismissed it under Rule 52/struck it out accordingly. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to consider the breach of contract claim under section 3 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 and the Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) Order 1994, and it refused the respondent's strike-out application. No merits determination was made. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Selkent Bus Company Limited v Moore [1996] IRLR 661
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser EAT 0165/07
- Rule 2 overriding objective
- Rule 37 striking out
- Rule 52 withdrawal
- section 80F Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 80G Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.