Case 4111915/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Jennifer Howie v Srinivas Badam — 2019
- Case reference
- 4111915/2018
- Decision date
- 30 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rory McPherson
- Venue
- Inverness
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jennifer Howie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Inverness, the tribunal gave oral reasons and dismissed Jennifer Howie's claims against the first respondent and the second respondent. The second respondent is described in the judgment as a dissolved company and did not appear or take part. Against the third respondent, MSG Network Ltd, the tribunal upheld the claims for breach of contract and for failure to provide a written statement under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal dismissed the remaining claims against the third respondent. It ordered the third respondent to pay Jennifer Howie £790.83 immediately, and recorded that there was no prescribed element in that award.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | First claimant's claims against the first respondent were dismissed; the written reasons do not itemise the individual heads. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | First claimant's claims against the second respondent were dismissed; the written reasons do not itemise the individual heads. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | First claimant's breach of contract claim against the third respondent succeeded. The award was not split between successful heads. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | First claimant's claim for failure to provide a written statement under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded against the third respondent. The award was not split between successful heads. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | First claimant's remaining claims against the third respondent were dismissed; the written reasons do not specify each remaining head. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £791
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.