Case 4111920/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Yule v Lakemere Global Holdings Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111920/2019
- Decision date
- 26 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Yule
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 29 November 2019 asking her to identify which of the two respondents employed her at the time her employment ended. No reply was received, and the Tribunal wrote again on 7 January 2020 requesting a response by 22 January 2020.
When there was still no response, the Tribunal wrote on 28 January 2020 to say that a Judge was considering striking out the claim because it was not being actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to disagree with that course or request a hearing by 12 February 2020, but nothing was received.
The claim was therefore struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground in rule 37(1)(d), namely that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claims or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim types. The Tribunal struck the claim out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued after the claimant did not respond to repeated tribunal correspondence. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.