Case 4112024/2012 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Coyle v Unrepresented North Lanarkshire Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4112024/2012
- Decision date
- 10 August 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- COET Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Coyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 4 July 2017 the tribunal gave Ms Coyle an opportunity to provide written reasons by 18 July 2017, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The respondent, North Lanarkshire Council, was represented by a solicitor at the hearing.
The judgment records that Ms Coyle did not give an acceptable reason why a strike out should not be made and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). No substantive liability decision or remedy award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify a substantive claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out for not having been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.