Case 4112028/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Dargie v Hilton Grand Vacations UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4112028/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hosie
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Dargie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within Rule 37(1)(d). The judgment records that on 16 January 2020 the tribunal gave Mr Dargie an opportunity to provide written reasons by 23 January 2020, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out.
Mr Dargie did not provide an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Hosie struck out the claim. No substantive findings on liability or remedy are recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the substantive type of claim in the extracted text. It states only that the claim was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37(1)(d)
- Rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.